<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Real Age&#8221; Needs Real Editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2009/08/02/real-age-real-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2009/08/02/real-age-real-editors/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to topics that fall within the general theme of UltimateFatBurner.com (i.e, exercise, body building, supplements,weight loss, diet, etc), but outside the realm of product reviews. Please review our posting protocols page before contributing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:36:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elissa</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2009/08/02/real-age-real-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-4039</link>
		<dc:creator>Elissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/?p=2412#comment-4039</guid>
		<description>It certainly doesn&#039;t look like the people writing the weekly updates are qualified, at any rate...this is such a fundamental gaffe that it can&#039;t be explained any other way.  And the bar is set pretty low for &quot;qualified&quot; - you don&#039;t need to be an M.D. or a Ph.D. to write this stuff.

I get absolutely furious when I see things like this - it&#039;s one of my pet peeves.  Anyone posing as a &quot;guru&quot; or &quot;expert&quot; has an obligation to get it right - you can&#039;t just throw professional standards out the door because there are deadlines to meet and you have to keep churning out material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly doesn&#8217;t look like the people writing the weekly updates are qualified, at any rate&#8230;this is such a fundamental gaffe that it can&#8217;t be explained any other way.  And the bar is set pretty low for &#8220;qualified&#8221; &#8211; you don&#8217;t need to be an M.D. or a Ph.D. to write this stuff.</p>
<p>I get absolutely furious when I see things like this &#8211; it&#8217;s one of my pet peeves.  Anyone posing as a &#8220;guru&#8221; or &#8220;expert&#8221; has an obligation to get it right &#8211; you can&#8217;t just throw professional standards out the door because there are deadlines to meet and you have to keep churning out material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Makster</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2009/08/02/real-age-real-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-4038</link>
		<dc:creator>Makster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/?p=2412#comment-4038</guid>
		<description>Thats to bad. It seems like another fairly reputable source of info is in question.

I also get the weekly &quot;tips of the week&quot;. I also usually just glance at the headlines and delete them. Every once in a while I will check one out.

It now gives me cause to think that the info is not always correct, and the people doing them are not qualified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats to bad. It seems like another fairly reputable source of info is in question.</p>
<p>I also get the weekly &#8220;tips of the week&#8221;. I also usually just glance at the headlines and delete them. Every once in a while I will check one out.</p>
<p>It now gives me cause to think that the info is not always correct, and the people doing them are not qualified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
