Quite a lot, actually.

Paul’s awesome post on phony supplement review sites spawned a bit of discussion (both in the comments and via e-mail) about the importance of knowing WHO you’re getting information from.  It’s about credibility: Paul and I both have our names out there on the reviews posted on UltimateFatBurner.com - which means that we can be held accountable for what we write.  The authors behind a bogus site, on the other hand, are more likely to be anonymous – for obvious reasons.

This can be true for other forms of internet “information” as well…including health/fitness info.  A perfect example of this is a site I stumbled over last week, titled “The Best Way To Exercise.com”.*

I was asked about the site by a member of the “Fat Loss Revealed” forum.  Naturally, I’d never heard of it, so I wandered on over to take a look…and damn near fell off my chair, laughing.  It’s a multi-page ad for a super-dee-dooper “secret” workout program… and I gotta hand the author credit for chutzpah.  Anyone who could write this, has got big brass ones.

Finally… a Trainer You Can TRUST!

World Renown…

Personal Trainer…

Fitness Authority…

Health Professional…

Exercise Physiologist…

Neuromuscular Bioenergeticist…

Pick a title, any title… this is me – any and all.  I don’t care what you call me – as long as you’re willing to listen.  Who I am shouldn’t matter as much as what I know.  To be honest, I’d actually rather maintain some degree of anonymity, so that the messenger doesn’t get in the way of the message.

Emphasis mine.

Lemme get this straight…this ad was written by a trainer who’s “world renown” (sic) but prefers to remain anonymous so “the messenger doesn’t get in the way of the message”???

Riiiiigggght… Call me suspicious, but this isn’t exactly the right way to win my trust.

The only difference between this and some anonymous review site, is that the author has the cojones to spin anonymity as a virtue!  Nice try, but it’s completely bass ackwards:  a world renowned trainer’s name would ADD credibility to the message, not detract from it.  Even if the name didn’t ring a bell, I could still “Google” it for some independent verification.  Self-proclaimed experts are a dime-a-dozen, after all. Why on Earth should I be “willing to listen” to one if I can’t validate his/her claims of expertise?

And brother, does the author make claims!  For example, s/he…

  • has the best certfication
  • attended the best schools
  • had the best grades in his /her class
  • is ”officially” certifiably smart
  • has written the best books with the best fitness secrets
  • produced the best fitness training DVDs
  • owns one of the best fitness centers in the country
  • has millions of people watching him/her online every month
  • normally charges people $500 per hour.

We also learn that s/he’s “won competitions” and “turned heads” – despite the fact that s/he’s had to work…

through and around a broken lumbar vertebra, rheumatoid arthritis, 8 years of undiagnosed Lyme disease, head-on rollover car accident… brain injury, broken bones, bruised ego… bouncing back time and time again.

Ok, the brain injury part I believe… :-D

But seriously, I could just as easily claim I have a Ph.D. in Astrophysics from M.I.T.; was part of the team that created the Hubble Space Telescope; am a former chess grandmaster and a descendant of Louis the 14th.  It’s complete BS, of course, but if I made these claims anonymously, how could anyone possibly check?

So, what’s in a name?  Like I said above: it’s about the source’s credibility.   Doesn’t matter whether it’s a supp review site or an ad for a (pricey) “secret” fitness program – a credible author should be willing to have his/her name associated with it.

*I’m not linking to it on purpose – I have no intention of directing traffic over there (just in case).