<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questioning Claims &#8211; Part II: A Little Knowledge Can Be a Dangerous Thing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2008/11/26/questioning-claims-part-ii-a-little-knowledge-can-be-a-dangerous-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2008/11/26/questioning-claims-part-ii-a-little-knowledge-can-be-a-dangerous-thing/</link>
	<description>Dedicated to topics that fall within the general theme of UltimateFatBurner.com (i.e, exercise, body building, supplements,weight loss, diet, etc), but outside the realm of product reviews. Please review our posting protocols page before contributing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:36:53 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2008/11/26/questioning-claims-part-ii-a-little-knowledge-can-be-a-dangerous-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-3638</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/?p=458#comment-3638</guid>
		<description>&quot;...it’s not enough to simply say, “that’s wrong” - it’s important to explain WHY.&quot;

Exactly. Because otherwise you have exactly the same credibility as the person making the countering argument... zero (reminds me of Monty Python&#039;s &quot;The Argument&quot;). And besides, it&#039;s not showing a whole lot of respect for your visitor. 

There are a couple of &quot;supplement-detractors&quot; who operate primarily online and whose main argument is &quot;they don&#039;t work.&quot; They don&#039;t bother to explain why, and in doing so, they are doing their customers a huge disservice. 

It takes effort and time to do so, but it has to be done. You can&#039;t simply discard all supplements-even those with ingredients backed by clinical data-without explaining the reasoning behind your argument. Because more often than not, there is a &quot;germ&quot; of truth behind the claims for many of the supplements on the market.
 
That&#039;s why it takes time to prepare the materials presented on this site... there&#039;s a lot of research involved!

Great post, Elissa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;it’s not enough to simply say, “that’s wrong” &#8211; it’s important to explain WHY.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly. Because otherwise you have exactly the same credibility as the person making the countering argument&#8230; zero (reminds me of Monty Python&#8217;s &#8220;The Argument&#8221;). And besides, it&#8217;s not showing a whole lot of respect for your visitor. </p>
<p>There are a couple of &#8220;supplement-detractors&#8221; who operate primarily online and whose main argument is &#8220;they don&#8217;t work.&#8221; They don&#8217;t bother to explain why, and in doing so, they are doing their customers a huge disservice. </p>
<p>It takes effort and time to do so, but it has to be done. You can&#8217;t simply discard all supplements-even those with ingredients backed by clinical data-without explaining the reasoning behind your argument. Because more often than not, there is a &#8220;germ&#8221; of truth behind the claims for many of the supplements on the market.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why it takes time to prepare the materials presented on this site&#8230; there&#8217;s a lot of research involved!</p>
<p>Great post, Elissa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
