Is There Anything To This Whole “Detox Diet” Fad?
If there’s something that keeps coming up over and over again in the daily feedback I receive from visitors, it’s this whole “detox” thing. And it’s not surprising really, since detox diets and detoxing are a pretty popular fad. You can find detox diet books on Amazon, and pills on the Internet and in your local health food store. Everywhere you look, everyone — including several high profile Hollywood celebrities — is “detoxing” or doing a “cleanse” or some such thing to “rid their body of toxins.”
But is there really anything to this whole fad?
Having just finished reviewing a product that contained a detox element, and due to the sheer volume of e-mails pertaining to this subject, I figured it was high time I compiled all the relevant information into a blog post for easy access.
So here we go.
Depending on which detox product you’re investigating, the claims justifying its usage may vary…
- Toxins and environmental poisons are keeping you both ill and fat.
- People who don’t experience regular bowel movements risk illness, obesity and a whole string of maladies as the “trapped waste rots inside.” (This is based on the popular misconception that regular, daily bowel movements are an indicator of perfect health. Fact is, bowel movements are a very individual thing — it’s perfectly healthy to have one every other day or even every couple of days).
- Regular “detoxes”, including fasting and occasionally some rather bizarre eating habits can help your body function more efficiently.
- Your body is being overrun by a nasty array of creepy-crawlies that are keeping you fat and unhealthy (this outrageous and unsubstantiated claim is addressed by Elissa in this blog post).
Considering how dire the situation appears, you’d think medical professionals would be encouraging detoxing as both a general health solution and an option for losing weight (if detoxing is really so effective in this regard). And are they? Hardly. Check some of these quotations from this Sense About Science Detox Press Release…
“The body’s own detoxification systems are remarkably sophisticated and versatile. They have to be, as the natural environment that we evolved in is hostile. It is remarkable that people are prepared to risk seriously disrupting these systems with unproven ‘detox’ diets, which could well do more harm than good.” (Professor Alan Boobis OBE, Toxicologist, Division of Medicine, Imperial College London).
“The only thing that loses weight on a detox diet is your wallet.”
(Dr John Hoskins, Environmental Toxicologist, Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry)
“The concept of ‘detox’ is a marketing myth rather than a physiological entity. The idea that an avalanche of vitamins, minerals, and laxatives taken over a 2 to 7 day period can have a long-lasting benefit for the body is also a marketing myth.” (DR Catherine Collins, Chief Dietician, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London)
“‘Detox’ is a meaningless term that is used all the time. And because it hasn’t been defined, it’s impossible to say if it’s worked or if it hasn’t.” (Ursula Arens, Registered Dietician, British Dietetic Association)
“Detox diets and products may not do harm, except, perhaps, to your wallet, but neither do they do you much good. Your natural bodily functions are effective at clearing out harmful substances and there is little you can do to enhance these. Patience and a proper diet are more valuable than detox products and supplements.” (DR Paul Illing, Chartered Scientist, Registered Toxicologist and Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry)
“The detox fad – or fads, as there are many methods – is an example of the capacity of people to believe in (and pay for) magic despite the lack of any sound evidence. This is a trend that should worry us all.” (Professor Martin Wiseman, Visiting Professor of Human Nutrition, University of Southampton).
Also of interest is this video of a study performed by the BBC,where the effectiveness of various popular “detox” diets were tested on the liver and kidney function of a group of healthy young women. The results? Nien. Nyet. Nada. Nothing.
In fact, there isn’t a single piece of real scientific evidence validating any of the detox claims, or even the detox diets (Dr. Ed Zimney, M.D., calls one popular diet, “the Master Cleanse Diet” a “Master Scam”).
Sure, if you eat too much tuna, there’s little doubt you could end up suffering from mercury toxicity. But as Dr. Zimney says in his review of The Master Cleanse Diet…
“And if you think the Master Cleanse or any other cleansing procedure is going to remove mercury from your body, you are 100 percent wrong.”
So there’s no evidence of any sort — anywhere — that “detoxes,” “cleanses”, or detox diets do anything useful.
In my opinion, the retailers of detox products are using scare tactics (eg. our world is polluted and getting more so, your body has become a repository for nasty, cancer causing chemicals and so on) to coerce you into using their products. And while it’s true that our world is becoming more polluted and our bodies are certainly becoming more poisoned (from mercury and arsenic from fish like tuna, for example), there’s no evidence that adopting a rigorous “cleansing” program, drinking lemon-flavored water for 7 days, or swallowing pills that contain an indiscriminate amount of natural ingredients will do anything to help eliminate the sort of toxins that typically concentrate in liver and tissues.
Sure, some of the detox diets I’ve looked briefly at will certainly help you lose weight. But it ain’t magic at work, or the miraculous healing abilities of the assorted, included ingredients. It’s simple caloric restriction — starvation, more like. And starvation diets are to be avoided as they tend to compromise lean muscle tissue (which is metabolically active tissue) as much as they do fat. Since the loss of lean tissue compromises your metabolism, it’s much easier to regain weight — and then some — once you go off the program.
Yes, I have heard of people who claim to have had great results from detox products. Are these claims genuine? Probably some of them are. However, there’s no discounting the placebo effect. Additionally, I have no doubt that anyone adopting the eating habits of one of the more sensible detox programs — in lieu of the high-fat, high-carb North American diet — is going to feel better. A LOT better. But is this something that can be attributed to some miraculous detoxing effect, or simply the fact that you’ve switched from an “all-crap” diet, and actually started eating fruits, veggies and drinking a ton of water?
Don’t get me wrong… to be able to cleanse our systems of all the “nasties” would be lovely. But so far, there’s no evidence any of the detox products on the market are anything but a complete hoax. Until then, I’ll stick to the basics; smart diet, lots of water, plenty of exercise. Ahhh…
That’s my kind of detox!
Share




Rob on 16 May 2008 at 6:20 am #
Good report! I have watched as four different people who are reasonably active, workout at the gym, eat healthy etc. Have periodically “detoxed” on this 7-10 day gimmick once or even twice a year and the overall results are a disaster.
Each time they do it, the shock to their metabolism makes things worse as in a few weeks time they start to accumulate more fat than before. In a months time after the starvation diet they look worse than before.
My advice to anyone thinking about it is DON’T DO IT! There are much better ways to lose body fat and keep it off. I know as I am 48 years old and have easily maintained 6% or lower bf for two years now.
Rob Aka Littlebigman on 03 Jun 2008 at 3:25 am #
Here’s an update from my remarks made on May 16. A guy at my gym who strongly advocates this 10 day cleansing fast to everyone he meets and has talked several people I know into doing it just came of his most recent “cleansing” yesterday.
Today he was struting around the gym bragging about his success with it, yet he still has nearly the same adipose fat above his hips (lovehandles) that he had before he started. The 10 day fast used to almost dissolve them completely, now it doesn’t.
These are his worst results ever. It’s sad that everyone but him can tell it’s not working so well anymore.
Now I say all the more so, DON’T DO IT!
Elissa on 03 Jun 2008 at 4:28 am #
LOL – well, even if it did “work” (at some level) before, it sounds very much like the lard crept back on again. If that’s the case, such a regime is no better than your typical, “yo-yo” diet syndrome. What’s there to brag about?
I’ll answer my own question here: it has nada to do with the results. It has everything to do with making sure everyone knows how “disciplined” he is.
bendis on 08 Oct 2008 at 8:52 pm #
OK, you can bash the Master Cleanser all you want but I just did it, not the full 10 days yet but 5, and I really began to feel awesome. Not to mention, my coffee addiction (10 cups a day, sometimes more) is gone. Sure, I’ve had the worst headache imaginable (I suffer, or used to, from regular migraines, probably due to all the caffeine) for the first two days of the cleanse but I braved through it. The idea is you just need to know what to expect more than the “discipline” you mention. If you know what to expect, it gets easier, and you see good results fast.
I did my research before going on this cleanse and read both “The Master Cleanser with Special Needs and Problems” by Stanley Burroughs, the creator of Master Cleanser, as well as “The Complete Master Cleanse” by Tom Woloshyn. I found Stanley’s book (more like booklet) good but Tom’s book is the one that covers it all. I would highly recommend you read it before you open your uninformed mouth on this subject.
Paul on 10 Oct 2008 at 6:13 pm #
Does quoting 6 notable and respected, “properly accredited” professionals while presenting a “facts-centric” overview on the detox fad really justify…
“… open your uninformed mouth on this subject.”
The fact is, reading “cleanse” books by “cleanse” authors hardly constitutes “research.” It’s hardly impartial material.
If and when you can return here and provide some real evidence – you know, journal references like the ones that MUST be found in the books you read – I would be happy to revise my article.
And did you miss this part of the article?…
“I have no doubt that anyone adopting the eating habits of one of the more sensible detox programs — in lieu of the high-fat, high-carb North American diet — is going to feel better. A LOT better. But is this something that can be attributed to some miraculous detoxing effect, or simply the fact that you’ve switched from an “all-crap” diet, and actually started eating fruits, veggies and drinking a ton of water?”
In other words, a detox diet/plan may have positive effects for you, although it has nothing to do with any “detoxing” effect.
Waiting on those journal references and some real evidence.
bendis on 11 Oct 2008 at 7:01 am #
Paul,
My reply was not directed at your article but, rather, at the other posters’ replies (Elissa and Rob) both of whom just pretty much said “don’t do it” WITHOUT any “journal” entries or whatever else YOU consider a “real” proof.
What they used as their kind of a proof (that the cleanse does not work) is a “guy at the gym” or his “discipline” (or lack thereof), or called the cleanse a gimmick, or a disaster – where is their “proof”? They expressed their own opinions, without providing any factual evidence whatsoever, just hearsay and speculation.
Since I actually bothered to read some books (pretty good ones, may I add) on the subject BEFORE posting here, I felt justified in using the term “uninformed mouth” and, again, it had nothing to do with your article but everything to do with the other postings.
The other posters’ comments sounded just like something I have heard, over and over, from a regular GP. Indeed, the conventional medicine doctors have such a great success in getting people healthy, don’t they? Just prescribe more and more drugs to treat what’s ailing, then prescribe more drugs to treat the side effects of the treatments, and so on and so forth.
I have personally been that road many times and gotten to the point of being sick and tired of getting absolutely nowhere, or rather – getting worse… hence the time for research (you might call it “facts-centric”, it really doesn’t bother me).
Master Cleanse was, in all honesty, the only thing that netted a whole lot of positive effects, physical and psychological and I can say yes, it did work wonders for me. But then again, I DID follow the instructions precisely.
Yes, I have read about it and yes, I have tried and tested it on myself, and again, yes, it worked.
If my post offended you, I apologize. Had no idea you were so easily offended…
Paul on 11 Oct 2008 at 4:06 pm #
I was not offended, even if my post gave you the impression I was. A “matter of fact” response can sometimes give that impression when there’s no human “inflection” involved. So no worries. About the other poster’s comments…
Elissa appeared to be commenting directly on Rob’s comments. Rob presented some real world “detox” experience – only what he’s seen – mind you. Neither poster would have added much to the discussion by adding more on the absence of clinical proof, since I’d already covered that in the article.
One other point; The comments that obviously upset you about The Master Cleanse diet were made by Dr. Zimney, whom I merely quoted in the article.
And lastly, I’m certainly not arguing that the results you experienced were not real. What I’m suggesting is that they were not the result of some “detoxing” effect.
Our job here is to present facts, whether they go “against the grain” or not. I have no stake in “detox” diets, so it doesn’t matter to me whether we present a strongly “pro” or “con” case… only that what we do present is reflective of the facts. In this spirit, I was unable to find one single credible scientific reference to back any of the claims made by the retailers of detox diets/products.
That’s why I asked you; send me the independently verified, peer reviewed data that validates any of this, and I’ll make the appropriate modifications to the article. I was not merely being a smart ass.
Elissa on 11 Oct 2008 at 7:37 pm #
“My reply was not directed at your article but, rather, at the other posters’ replies (Elissa and Rob) both of whom just pretty much said “don’t do it” WITHOUT any “journal” entries or whatever else YOU consider a “real” proof.
What they used as their kind of a proof (that the cleanse does not work) is a “guy at the gym” or his “discipline” (or lack thereof), or called the cleanse a gimmick, or a disaster – where is their “proof”? They expressed their own opinions, without providing any factual evidence whatsoever, just hearsay and speculation.”
As Paul points out, I was responding to Rob’s comments – which were dead-on w/respect to the situation he was describing. And I completely agree with his statement: “there are much better ways to lose body fat and keep it off.” I’m personally acquainted with the man and know he knows what he’s talking about: at 48, he’s 6% bodyfat and has a naturally-acquired, competition-level body he could proudly display on a men’s magazine cover.
I’m also constrained to point out: he looks a lot healthier than Tom Woloshyn does.
Likewise, I’ve read more than “some books” (you can check out my photo and bio on the “about us” page of this site) – and I’m married to a man with a degree in environmental toxicology, and years of experience in dealing with environmental hazards…thus, I have a rather extensive knowledge base to draw on.
Thus, neither of us has an “uninformed mouth.” Nor am I “easily offended” – although I’ll note in passing that it’s not a great idea – if you prefer to discuss points of disagreement in a civil manner – to accuse people of being “uninformed” before you actually know if they are or not.
At any rate, as Paul points out, there is precisely zero proof that so-called “detox” programs work via reducing “toxins” – a term that is invariably vague and undefined. I don’t doubt it has some psychological value: it motivated you to take a break from eating unhealthy foods and make a “fresh” start. But this has nada to do with any actual purging of “toxins.”
Look, I completely understand why you might be upset to see us slamming something that you feel has been beneficial. But the point of confusion is about cause and effect. It’s natural to assume that – if something works for you, it works for the reasons advanced – in this case, a reduction in your bioburden of “toxins.” But – as Paul notes in his post and comments – this isn’t a valid proposition. Your headaches for the first two days are a classic example: caffeine withdrawal is a recognized disorder…you would have experienced this simply by stopping caffeine, regardless of being on a cleansing program. A belief in the program obviously helped you make the break, but you didn’t actually need the program – in any physiological sense – to do it.
Hopefully, you’ll continue on your quest to improve your fitness and well-being by sticking with a comprehensive diet and workout program…Paul’s got a few quality books reviewed on the main site – they’re from reliable sources who can take you well beyond what practitioners like Woloshyn can.
Lisa on 15 Oct 2008 at 5:32 pm #
Both my aunt and my cousin went on serious ‘detoxes’ a few years back in order to ‘cleanse’ their bodies of toxins and all these nasty chemicals that my homeopathic practicing cousin insisted were overrunning their bodies. They were both on prescribed programs from homeopathic practitioners. From what I observed over the next 1-2 months I became incredibly concerned,no, worried.
I watched them both systematically remove various types of foods from their diets (ie, grains, ‘white’ foods, animal based proteins, etc). All of which seemed relatively innocent for a short while. But after a couple of weeks this person had my aunt down to eating nothing but blanched almonds and grapes. They weren’t allowed even most vegetation because it ‘promoted or contained mold growth’. They both lost a ridiculous amount of weight, to the point where they were essentially emaciated. Their skin was sallow and eyes were dark and sunken. Both women lost an incredible amount of muscle mass and looked terrible. They were understandably excited over their weight loss (both had always been on the ‘hefty’ side all their lives). But they obviously couldn’t see how unhealthy they both looked.
Yet in all this, this ‘practitioner’ had them completely convinced that they were ‘flushing’ their systems and would come back healthier. I’d never seen them look more UNhealthy. They were exhausted and had no energy at all.
I am fully convinced that the whole detox fad is a complete scam. Of course you’re going to lose weight, you’re seriously restricting calories! I saw no immediate benefits from what they did, and no long term benefits in either of them. All I saw was a whole lot of brainwashing and innocent excitement over an over-hyped fad.
Our bodies were created with the most complex and sophisticated cleansing systems imaginable and I am convinced that our finite minds will never be able to improve on this incredibly effective and perfect system.
Our responsibility is to provide our bodies with a wholesome, balanced diet and an appropriate level of exercise. It doesn’t need our help to ‘filter’ or ‘flush’.
Chris on 08 Jan 2009 at 1:01 am #
I am really confused as to which direction I should proceed. My knife isn’t the sharpest in the drawer. That’s my way of saying I don’t have a PhD or expertise in any particular subject. I am looking for information on the Acai Berry Supreme supplement. It just seems that the experts are divided. What would you genuinely advise?
Elissa on 08 Jan 2009 at 1:22 am #
LOL – depends on who you call an “expert.”
See Paul’s review on this supplement here: http://www.ultimatefatburner.com/extreme-acai-berry-review.html
See also: http://vitamins.ultimatefatburner.com/acai-berry-review.html for a little perspective on acai.
Automated Blog Post & Comment Software Sucks... | No-BS-Marketing: Straight Talk On Internet Marketing on 08 Feb 2010 at 5:06 pm #
[...] obvious (but ridiculous) attempt to build links to the “Master Cleanse Diet” web site (the post in question thoroughly debunks the entire detox/cleanse fad that’s “in vogue” at the [...]
eLi on 10 Mar 2010 at 1:38 am #
Throwing my uninformed hat into the ring – I have been told by several accredited holistic practitioners (Homeopath, ND, LAc and OMD) that
the Master Cleanse is actually unhealthy because the lack of protein causes your body to start metabolizing your internal organs, and that the excretion is caused from that and some sort of mucous created during the cleanse rather than “old” matter being cleaned out. Thoughts? I have never seen anything other than anecdotal evidence in favor of a cleanse, and I have done a considerable amount of looking in an effort to correctly inform my clients (as a massage therapist). With all the new evidence coming out about the efficacy (or lack of) anti-depressants, you really cannot discount the very real placebo effect!
Elissa on 10 Mar 2010 at 3:36 am #
Actually, metabolizing your internal organs is about the last step in starvation, so isn’t likely to happen during a relatively short period of deprivation. But some loss of muscle mass is likely to occur along with losses of fat, glycogen and body water.
I work on a very basic premise: people who make positive claims should be able to back them up with supporting evidence. Where I come from, “toxins” have names and chemical structures. Above all, they’re measurable. So where’s the evidence that “detoxing” actually eliminates one’s bioburden of environmental “toxins” (actually, toxicants)? Where’s the evidence that people who perform these measures actually live longer or healthier lives than those who simply cut the crap out of their diets?
Now, I don’t discount the placebo effect at all. As noted elsewhere on the blog, this is a very legit phenomenon. And ritual “cleanses” may – in fact- help some people make a break with old, destructive habits. Some people respond better to “all or nothing” directives vs. chronic discipline, so a “cleanse” may actually be psychologically easier for some to deal with. So I won’t knock it from that perspective.
But the problem that I have with placebos, is that their success encourages a belief in magical thinking. In this case, you have to believe you’re doing something good for your body, in the absence of any legitimate evidence that this is so. This is why “prescribing” placebos is a real ethical minefield for doctors - they may help their patients, but only at the cost of their honesty and integrity.
In other words, a placebo treatment is based on an abuse of trust. It’s a lie… and a potentially destructive one, at that, as the short-term benefits may eventually be outweighed by long-term ones. When you fail to question or challenge statements of”fact” seen/heard in the popular media, and only process the “information” that you want to hear/read, it makes you easy prey for those who would seek to profit by your credulity and naivete.